Report Abuse

Labels

Skip to main content

Kinds of Writ Petitions - Zulfikar Parpia

 






A writ petition is a direction by the High Court to the lower courts and tribunals directing them to stop doing an activity. A Writ can be filed in the High Court under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution and Article 32 of the Constitution in the Supreme Court. A Writ petition is an order passed by the court if there is a violation of Fundamental Rights by any Government official or authority or body. A Writ petition can be filed for both civil and criminal case. 

Kinds of writ petitions:

There are 5 kinds of Writ Petitions, Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Certiorari, Quo Warranto, and Prohibition. 

Habeas Corpus:

A Writ of Habeas Corpus is filed in the High Court in cases where a person is illegally detained by a person or an authority. In such cases the court passes the Writ of Habeas Corpus and directs the official to present the detained person before the court, the court directs the official to provide reasonable grounds for detaining such person and if the authority fails to provide any reasonable grounds then the detained person will be immediately released by the Court. 

In Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (1980 AIR 1579) case, an application was made to the Supreme Court through a letter written by a co-convict on the maltreatment of the prisoners. This letter was taken up by the Supreme Court and it issued the writ of habeas corpus stating that this writ can not only be used against the illegal arrest of the prisoner but also for his protection against any maltreatment or inhuman behavior by the detaining authorities. [i]

In the case of “Rajakkannu V. State of Tamil Nadu (also known as the very famous Jai Bhim case), the court held that after the investigation by CBCID officials appointed by the Hon’ble High Court, the court held that it is a case of custodial death. A compensation of Rs. 5,00,00/- citing Nilabati Behera vs. State of Orissa [AIR 1993 SC 960], the Court should grant the relief, and defense of sovereign immunity is not available to the State Agency. As such, the Hon’ble Court directed the Government to provide a compensation of Rs. 1,10,000/- of which, Rs. 10,000/- was to be given in the form of cash and the remaining Rs. 1,00,000/- to be invested in a safe scheme that delivers a monthly income of not less than Rs. 1,000/-. Further investments were also made in the name of the minor daughter of the Petitioner as well as to other victims who had suffered an assault by the Respondent police. In finality, a cost of Rs. 5,000/- was awarded to the counsel for the Petitioner. [ii]

 

Mandamus:

Mandamus in Latin means “We Command”; it is a direction by the court to a public authority to do a work that it has failed to do. It is a direction by the Court against a public officer, a public corporation, a tribunal, a lower court, or the government. It cannot be issued against a private body, individual, the president, or the governor of the state and working chief justice. It cannot be issued in the following circumstances.

·         The duty in question is discretionary and not mandatory. 

·         For the performance of a non-statutory function. 

·         Performance of the duty involves rights of a purely private nature.

·         Where such direction involves a violation of any law. 

·         Where there is any other remedy available under the law. [iii]

In the landmark case of SP Gupta v. Union of India (1981), the judges ruled that the president of India cannot have a writ issued against him that directs him to fix the number of judges of the High Court and fill vacancies. The courts cannot issue a writ of Mandamus against persons like the president and governors. [iv]

 

Certiorari

Certiorari is a Latin term meaning to ‘Certify’. If a higher court suspects that there is an order been passed by the lower court or tribunal beyond its powers or jurisdiction then that case by passing a writ of certiorari it can either transfer the case to itself or quash the order passed by the lower court or the tribunal. A writ of certiorari is passed by the High court or Supreme court to the lower court in certain circumstances.

·         When a lower court passes an order which is not under its jurisdiction 

·         • When a subordinate court acts or issues orders in cases that are not within its jurisdiction or cross its jurisdictional boundaries in ways it is not authorised to.

·         When a subordinate court actions in flagrant violation of the law or procedural rules, or

·         When a subordinate court acts in breach of natural justice principles and there is no procedure in place.

3-Judge Bench in the case of Radhey Shyam v. Chhabi Nath(2015) 5 SCC 423 extensively referring to the legal position on the scope of the writ of certiorari concluded that orders of the civil court stand on a different footing from the orders of authorities or tribunals or courts other than judicial/civil courts. [v]

 

Quo Warranto:

Quo Warranto is a Latin term meaning ‘by what warrant’, the object of this writ is to prevent a person from holding an office he is not entitled to. The court can call upon a person who is holding a public office on what authority he is holding that office. It cannot be issued to a person holding a private office. This writ can be issued only under certain conditions, 

·         The office was created under the provisions of the Indian constitution but is under a private person who is not qualified to hold such office.

·         If any public office is wrongfully or illegally been undertaken by a private person

·         The nature of work done by the office must be public

In the case, Purushottam Lal vs State of Rajasthan Quo Warranto was filed against the CM of Rajasthan stating that the CM was not elected validly to the house. The court rejects the petition stating that if the CM holds office without authority, then it is a breach of the constitutional provision. The office of the Chief Minister is created by the constitution, so a member of the assembly is not a purpose of the office. Raising the questions on the Election of Chief Minister in this writ is not a proper form it must be raised through an election petition. [vi]

 

Prohibition:

The last Writ which is explained in the Indian Constitution is the Writ of Prohibition, it is issued by a superior, but it is not issued often. It is an extraordinary remedy issued to a lower court or a tribunal to stop them from deciding on a case because they do not have the jurisdiction. 

If a District Court is hearing a case that is already decided by the High Court in such cases the judgment will be termed as invalid as any lower court cannot hear a case that is already passed by the Higher Court. Such judgments will be termed invalid. 

In the case of S. Govind Menon v. Union of India (1967), a writ of prohibition can be issued in both circumstances of excess jurisdiction and absence of jurisdiction. Writ of prohibition was issued by a higher court, namely the Kerala High Court, to a lower court to take over jurisdiction that was not initially vested, or in other words, to compel lower courts to retain their jurisdictional limitations. The writ can be issued when there is an excess of jurisdiction as well as when there is an absence of jurisdiction. [vii]

 

Conclusion:

A Writ petition can be filed for a civil or a criminal case. A writ petition is an order by the High Court to the lower court directing them to stop doing an activity. A Writ petition is an order passed by the court if there is a violation of Fundamental Rights by any Government official or authority or body. A Writ can be filed in the High Court under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution and Article 32 of the Constitution in the Supreme Court.

 

  [i] https://cleartax.in/s/writs#:~:text=Therefore%2C%20a%20writ%20can%20be,to%20issue%20a%20specific%20writ

[ii] https://www.sekarreporter.com/the-jai-bheem-case-rajakannu-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-h-c-p-no-711-of-1993-facts-of-the-case-the-habeas-corpus-petition-had-been-filed-by-r-parvathy-the-wife-of-rajakannu-they-were-daily-w/

[iii] https://cleartax.in/s/writs#:~:text=Therefore%2C%20a%20writ%20can%20be,to%20issue%20a%20specific%20writ.

[iv] https://blog.ipleaders.in/writ-of-mandamus-and-its-usage-in-light-of-the-case-of-john-paily-v-the-state-of-kerala/#:~:text=In%20the%20landmark%20case%20of,like%20the%20president%20and%20governors

[v] https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/tag/writ-of-certiorari/

[vi] https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-541-law-of-writs-in-indian-constitution.html

[vii] https://blog.ipleaders.in/all-you-need-to-know-about-the-writ-of-prohibition/

Comments